SEO Consultant Esoos Bobnar |
email: ebobnar at gmail.com |
|
Affordable SEO Consulting for the Results-Oriented Online Business. |
||
|
Welcome to my blog. Here's a list of my best posts, as well as a complete archive of everything I've ever blogged about. « Avoiding the Little Leaks that Keep Websites Poor - A Review of The Big Book of Key Performance Indicators | Main | Free Your Blogrolls and Your Backlinks Will Follow » February 13, 2006How to Get Your Site Listed in DMOZ in Record TimeGetting your site listed in DMOZ is one of those holy grail achievements in Internet Marketing. It gives you a link from a trusted, reputable source, and one that's highly valued by search engines. What's more, it also gets your site listed in Google's own directory. I've been doing SEO consulting full-time for about 3 years now, and I've submitted a lot of sites to DMOZ. While I've had numerous sites added within a few days or weeks, there are plenty of other sites I've submitted well over a year ago that have yet to be included. That got me thinking: Why do some sites pop into DMOZ with almost no waiting, while others languish in the queue for a year or more (or never get in at all)? A recent thread over at Resource-Zone (the DMOZ editor's forum) helped provide some answers. In that thread, some of the editors seem to almost revel in the fact that they don't consider submissions to be an important way to find new sites to add to the DMOZ. Instead, they prefer to hunt down sites on their own, looking for the best sites to flesh out some of the underdeveloped niches in the directory. The simple fact is this: Most DMOZ editors could not give two rips about boosting your site's PageRank or helping you outrank your competition by giving you a trusted link from a site Google respects. Rather, they're trying to create a comprehensive guide to the best sites on the Internet. Note that they're not trying to list all the sites on the Internet; just the best ones. With that in mind, here's a few tips that might help speed up that next DMOZ submission:
As link-building guru Eric Ward recently remarked: For me it’s about the content. Can I help the content get known or not? I don't care if it’s a FORTUNE 500 company or a mom and pop site. If the content is about a specific topic and well done, then it deserves to be known and linked. If the content is crap, even if it’s produced by a large corporation, then why bother? It’s not me that gets the links for the content; it’s the content itself that earns the link. I'm just a conduit. That quote doesn't actually have anything to do with the DMOZ, but you replace the word "link" with "directory listing," I think it accurately sums up the perspective many DMOZ editors are using to list new sites. In my experience, the more information-rich the site, and the less overtly commercial, the faster it got listed. There's always going to be exceptions, of course (like this blog, which has been dangling in the queue for quite some time), but following these rules does tend to drastically speed things up. --> |
Top PostsWho's Linking to Your Site?Delicious SEO How to Get Dugg Get Wikipedia Links Access MySpace Viral Marketing for Beginners Get Listed in the Yahoo Directory for Free Subdirectories vs. Subdomains How to Hide Image Alt Text How to Get a PageRank 8 Link From Google How to Get Your Site Listed in DMOZ Flat Directory Structure Keyword Rich Domain Names How to Disable nofollow on Movable Type Good StuffMy Blind Baby SiteBlogometer |
|